Social Media

Crackdown on tech industry's legal shield

Last month, Trump signed an executive order targeting social media companies for allegedly censoring conservative viewpoints


The Justice Department will propose a major update Wednesday to the law that shields internet companies from liability for content on their sites — a move that follows President Donald Trump's call for platforms like Twitter and Facebook to be held to account for decisions found to be politically biased.

DOJ's proposal would strip companies of immunity under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act for user-generated content if the site facilitates or solicits third-party content that violates federal law, according to three people familiar with the proposal who weren’t authorized to speak on the record. It is also intended to push companies to be more fair in taking down content they find objectionable.

The proposal is set to be unveiled later Wednesday, according to a Justice Department official and another individual familiar with DOJ’s plans. The change will require legislation from Congress, where dozens of members of both parties have expressed concerns about the broad protections given to internet firms under Section 230, though they disagree what aspects are problematic and how it should be fixed.

The legal shield, enacted in 1996, has been heralded as the law that helped build the internet, affording companies protections from civil suits over user postings. But Attorney General William Barr and others have raised questions about the scope of the law and whether tech companies have used Section 230 to absolve themselves of responsibility for policing their platforms.

Last month, Trump signed an executive order targeting social media companies for allegedly censoring conservative viewpoints. The order came after Twitter posted fact-checks on his tweets. An industry-funded tech nonprofit has challenged the order’s constitutionality.

In February, the Justice Department held a workshop on Section 230 where prominent critics of the law outlined how companies have avoided liability for posts that allegedly aided terrorism, sex trafficking, and revenge porn.

Sens. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) and Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) in March unveiled their own legislation that would remove digital firms' legal immunity over users’ posts if they fail to prove they are doing enough to curtail sexual exploitation of children online.

Read more

Jeff Sessions claims he’s clueless about his DOJ’s snooping on Congress

Former Attorney General Jeff Sessions is telling associates he had no idea his Justice Department seized phone records of two top Democratic congressional critics of then-President Donald Trump. In the hours since The New York Times broke the news on Thursday that prosecutors subpoenaed Apple metadata from Reps. Adam Schiff (D-CA) and Eric Swalwell (D-CA), former Attorney General Sessions has privately told people that he wasn’t aware of, nor was he briefed on, the reported data seizures while he led the Trump DOJ. This week’s revelations were a surprise to him, according to a source familiar with the matter, and another person close to Sessions.

Watchdog investigates seizure of Democrats’ phone data

The US justice department’s internal watchdog launched an investigation on Friday after revelations that former president Donald Trump’s administration secretly seized phone data from at least two House Democrats as part of an aggressive leaks inquiry related to the Russia investigation into Trump’s conduct.

Trump feared Democrats would replace Biden with Michelle Obama, book claims

Donald Trump called Joe Biden a “mental retard” during the 2020 election, a new book says, but was reluctant to attack him too strongly for fear the Democrats would replace him with Hillary Clinton or Michelle Obama. Biden went on to beat Trump by more than 7m in the popular vote and by 306-232 in the electoral college, a result Trump deemed a landslide when it was in his favor against Clinton in 2016.

Intelligence failures left police officers exposed to a violent mob of Trump supporters

The deadly insurrection at the US Capitol was “planned in plain sight” but intelligence failures left police officers exposed to a violent mob of Trump supporters, a Senate investigation has found. The Capitol police intelligence division had been gathering online data since December about plots to storm the building on 6 January, including messages such as: “Bring guns. It’s now or never.” But a combination of bad communications, poor planning, faulty equipment and lack of leadership meant the warnings went unheeded, allowing the insurrectionists to overrun the Capitol and disrupt certification of Joe Biden’s election victory. Five people died.